A minimally invasive fusion technique may result in faster recovery screw fusion surgery, the coflex-F procedure often results in a Lanx® Aspen™ = %. Orthopedics Today | It is generally accepted that spinal fusion, in conjunction with decompression, produces better clinical outcomes in patients with. The Aspen line of spinal instrumentation products from Lanx is unique These devices can be used for less invasive surgery under certain circumstances. This technique gets a little difficult towards the lumbrosacral junction.
|Published (Last):||17 October 2006|
|PDF File Size:||12.22 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||4.37 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
The Aspen device has not been tested for safety and compatibility in the magnetic resonance MR environment. Contraindications may be relative or absolute.
This implant is designed to permit flexion of the spine, thus restricting mobility in extension and rotation. Although the initial reports represented the IPD as a safe, effective, and minimally invasive trchnique alternative for relief of neurological symptoms in patients with low back degenerative diseases, recent studies have demonstrated less impressive clinical results and higher rate of failure than initially reported.
This device is mainly used to expand the intervertebral space in mild and moderate lumbar stenosis. A dynamically degenerative modification of the lumbar spine has been panx when performing MRI under axial loading. Reuse of the implant components may result in reduced mechanical performance, malfunction, or failure of the device.
The BacFuse decompresses the spinal canal while supporting the formation of interspinous fusion Figure It provides an alternative to more conventional means of fixation such as pedicle screws or anterior plates.
The intervertebral level to be treated is identified by fluoroscopy. The bands are secured to the spacer and tightened: But in their study, they used the cost perspective of the hospital rather than that of the society; in addition, the senior author of the study was one of the inventors of the X-Stop device and had financial ties to the manufacturer.
Neural foramina area is increased after insertion of an interspinous device. The authors requested further biomechanical and clinical evidence to strongly support the recommendation of a stand-alone interspinous fusion device or as supplemental fixation to expandable posterior interbody cages [ 58 ].
In another report, published by the same authors, the X-Stop group showed improvements in physical and mental component scores Quality of life SF compared to both baseline and control patients. The examination is performed in a neutral position and after loading with axial and sagittal T2-weighted scans. For single level surgery, laminectomy was more effective, but X-Stop was less costly. We found an increasing number of recent studies suggesting that Aspsn may not be as free of complications and reoperations as previously reported in the first studies.
We listed the most important devices that are still on the market Table 1. Previous history of infection. In the first generation of the device, the wing clamps could be attached to the spinous processes by qspen suture passed through the central hole. When possible, the supraspinous ligament must be sutured. This device achieves spinal decompression by limiting the symptomatic extension while maintaining physiologic motion.
Aspen MIS Fusion System | Aspen MIS Fusion System by Zimmer Biomet
Proprietary spiked-plate design provides reliable bone fixation. The first interspinous implant for the lumbar spine was developed in the s by Knowles. Interspinous tecynique devices contrast with interspinous distraction devices also called spacers ; the latter are used alone for decompression and may not be fixed to the spinous processes.
The Aspen MIS Fusion System consists of a family of spinous process fixation devices designed for rigid, posterior fixation to promote fusion from T1 to S1. The center of the device is traversed by two oval openings which serve to increase the flexibility of the device during compression loading of the lumbar segments.
All content herein is protected by copyright, trademarks and other intellectual property rights, as applicable, owned by or licensed to Zimmer Biomet or its affiliates unless otherwise indicated, and must not be redistributed, duplicated or disclosed, in whole or in part, without the express written consent of Zimmer Biomet. Patients were randomized in a 2: Acute or chronic infectious diseases of any etiology or localization. It is anatomical shape consists of two concave shaped surgicaal, and it is core is an elastic spring which can be deformed.
BioMed Research International
The implant is preassembled on the inserter so it can be inserted without intermediate steps once the desired distraction is achieved. Pathophysiology and Mechanism yechnique Action The pathoanatomic feature of neurogenic intermittent claudication in lumbar degenerative diseases is the venous stasis in lumbar spine extension, causing neurologic symptoms as motor weakness in the lower extremities, pain, tingling, and sensory deficit, which make walking techniquf a long distance impossible.
Deterioration of the device after bone consolidation cannot be considered to constitute a dysfunction or deterioration in the characteristics of the implants. It must be applied between the spinous processes of the involved levels with monolateral MIS access right or left, depending on the affected side Figures 6 and 7. Axial CT image of the Aperius inserted at L4-L5 level showing the wings expanded on each side of the spinous process.
In a magnetic resonance imaging cadaver study, Richards et al.